Archive | Opinions

Vuvuzela: What’s All The Buzz About?

by Andrew Slotnick
Managing Editor

The world’s most widely broadcast sporting event is well underway in South Africa, celebrating the sport known as soccer in the USA—where “football” of course describes a sport that consists of using one’s hands to catch and carry an egg-shaped pigskin. While the visual excitement on the field is as stunning as ever, the roar of the crowd and the commentators must compete with a brand new menace: “BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.”

Anyone who has watched a World Cup game knows well the sound of a noisemaker so annoying I hesitate to call it an instrument, the vuvuzela. These ubiquitous plastic horns are crude bugles with a length around 3 feet and are capable of producing a sound pressure level of 127 dB, according to the news agency Agence France-Presse. Vuvuzelas pose a risk to spectators’ hearing as part of the general din at a World Cup match. The South African Medical Journal found that spectators near a vuvuzela in a simulated match environment experienced sound exposure well above South Africa’s legal limit for sound at the workplace.

As match attendees lose their hearing, viewers from around the world are losing patience about the change in atmosphere brought on by the unending buzzing sound. Complaints abound all over the internet, with the LA Times, Associated Press, and The New York Times Freakonomics Blog all voicing negative opinions. World Cup organizer FIFA has repeatedly insisted the horns will not be banned, which seems only fair since they are an important part of the host country’s soccer culture. So what are the millions of slightly inconvenienced fans to do?

Stephen J. Dubner of Freakonomics suggests that ESPN buy the horns from fans at the stadium to get rid of the noise, a prospect the enthusiastic South Africans would not relish. But a much simpler alternative exists. As Berklee students, we should know that an unpleasant sound at a fixed pitch is no problem at all for a bit of audio technology. Enterprising German fan Tobias Herre took matters into his own hands using a copy of Logic Pro and posted the results online. After discovering the frequencies of the horns and applying a little bit of parametric EQ, he was able to nearly eliminate the annoying tone of thousands of plastic horns. Applying such a filter to the stadium audio feed could easily remove most of the annoyance for audiences worldwide.

It looks as though ESPN is taking some steps to reduce the sound; an article on their website asserts “ESPN is altering the sound mix on its broadcasts to minimize the crowd noise.” Hopefully that means just reducing the buzzing tone, not the roaring crowd. The sound during the June 14 Paraguay-Italy game does seem pretty good, with the vuvuzelas present but not overpowering. For now, any fans wanting to hear live sound from the games must either put up with the vuvuzela, run their own outboard gear, or reach for the mute button.

The photo for this piece was taken by Dundas Football Club, used here under a Creative Commons license.

Posted in EditorialComments (1)

A Letter to Our Readers

Hello and thank you for visiting BerkleeGroove.com, the home of Berklee’s online newspaper and student voice, The Groove. My name is Andrew Slotnick and I am the new managing editor of this publication. Christine, Jehad, Raphael, Naomi and I could not be more excited to continue the commitment to quality that has characterized The Groove since its inception in 1997. We would like to thank Zac Taylor, Ann Driscoll, Paul Jefferson, and all the other former employees who have made this paper what it is today. Special thanks to Zac and Paul for fleeing the slow death of print journalism and moving to an online format; BerkleeGroove.com is an excellent site and we have plenty of room to grow.

We at The Groove promise to provide you the readers with content that is informational, entertaining, and relevant to the Berklee community. But our five-person team can’t do it alone; submissions from Berklee students, alumni, and employees are what keep this newspaper alive. So let us know about your band’s show this weekend, your friend’s new album, the coolest basement party in Allston, or what’s happening on-campus. Whether you have a finished piece to be published, a comment regarding today’s cafeteria lunch choices, or you just want to know why CampusCruiser is down again, send an email to thegroove@berklee.edu and it will be answered.

In this spirit of community involvement, I am proud to announce a new feature for the site: Facebook Connect. We are still working out a few bugs, but now you can leave comments on BerkleeGroove.com using your Facebook identity without having to create a new account. At the log in screen, simply click on the “Connect to Facebook” button and you will be prompted to give our application permission to log you in. This permission can be revoked at any time by visiting your Facebook application settings, and your password is never revealed. Additionally, any user without a Facebook page can still easily create an account on our website by providing a berklee.net email address. Facebook Connect is a useful service due to Facebook’s popularity among Berklee students, however all users should look carefully at how their information is being shared online and use caution when posting anything to the Internet using a real name.

Please check back often for updates to the site and let us know what you think. Keep your finger on the pulse of Summer 2010 with BerkleeGroove.com and get into The Groove!

Andrew C. Slotnick
Managing Editor

Posted in OpinionsComments (1)

Letter from the Editor

The New Groove Staff

Papa's got a brand new Groove.

By Zac Taylor
Managing Editor

You see these beautiful people in this picture? They’re your new snooty music journalists! Get to know them. From left to right, we have Naomi Gingold, Ann Driscoll, Andrew Slotnick, yours truly, Paul Jefferson, Jehad Choate, Christine Occhino, and Rafael Sanchez.

Paul, Annie, and I are off to other endeavors; namely, places like New York City and Los Angeles. But we’re leaving you in good hands. Andrew is taking over the reigns as managing editor, Rafael is our new web/graphics guru, and Naomi and Jehad are the new staff writers. And they would like to a) be your friend, b) know what’s cool about music from your point of view, and c) listen to your ideas about how to make the Groove as beneficial to us students as possible.

So that’s about it for me, boys and girls. I’ll probably submit a handful more articles, help the new folks get acclimated, and steal any free pizza that happens to find itself available around campus.

It has been an awful lot of fun writing about all of you, and you have all inspired me in countless ways. This is a fun place, yeah? I’m going to leave you with my graduation speech submission that didn’t quite get the go-ahead for Saturday (I’m sure Jack will do an awesome job); but it’s from the heart and I hope you enjoy it. Hit me up in the meantime if you need some help writing your bio or press release; I’d be happy to help.

Oh, I almost forgot–Come to my CD Release Show tonight (5/6) at Cafe 939!!

“Listen Hard”

You know that feeling music gives you? When the hair stands up on your arms. When those chills surge up and down your body. What is that thing?

When I was ten, I used to listen to Nirvana and Beatles CDs on a Discman (it’s what we listened to before iPods). I didn’t know what harmony meant, or how a groove was supposed to work, or even really notice that there were patterns called verses and choruses. All that mattered was that feeling those sounds gave me.  That thing.

If there’s one thing I have learned at Berklee, it’s that music does different things for different people. It fulfills different needs. Maybe you need a big fat beat to bob your head to. Maybe it’s a catchy pop-country tune. Maybe it’s that first note Jimi Hendrix plays in the solo from “Machine Gun.”

But here, depending on your major, it could be getting the reverb on the snare drum to sound just right. Or planning a twenty-five city tour for an artist that you manage. Or helping a patient recover with some soothing acoustic guitar. Or blogging about Lady Gaga’s dress, or lack thereof.

Whatever the case may be, it doesn’t matter what your thing is, why you have it, or how you came to have it. All that matters is THAT you have it. That it’s yours, and that it resonates with you. And Berklee didn’t give you that thing—you had it long before you got here. What’s cool about Berklee is that it can give you a blueprint of how to stir it up and bottle it.

A blueprint to help you find that special place where your muse hangs out. Where she takes her tea, and what kind of honey she puts in it. You learn how to listen to her, in her language. An Arab speaks Arabic; a Frenchman speaks French; I suppose your muse speaks music. Our hope is to one day be able to access this special place freely and readily; but remember—Luke Skywalker wasn’t always a master of the force, and Neo didn’t make his first jump in the Matrix.  But that didn’t stop them.

During my first semester here, guitar phenom Steve Vai said at a clinic: ‘Find out what you’re good at, and the rest is gravy.’ He was talking about that thing that gives you that feeling.

You don’t have to be famous or on TV to have that thing on overdrive. Most people here know that fame has more to do with money and body curves than anything remotely associated with a passion for music.

I bet you all have a friend that has looked at a famous musician and said, ‘I could play better than him.’ I know I have…But at t his stage in the game, we’re finding out that it’s not about who’s the best guitarist, best singer, best songwriter, or best sousaphone player. Technique can be perfected, but art cannot. The artists that can move you are the ones that A) have that thing spinning real hard for them, and B) also know how to show it to you. I’ve been moved as many times from a performance in a class, coffeehouse, or even subway platform than I have from watching whoever’s on TV.

You walk around these halls, and you see the jazz kids’ brains frolicking through the deepest jungles of harmony. You hear the gospel kids scatting the most ridiculous vocal runs. You see the synth kids chopping up sine waves into a galaxy of otherworldly sounds. You watch the singer-songwriters sending out text messages to get people out to Club Passim. Everyone is frantically pacing around this place in search of the keys to that code to his or her own special thing.

Now here we are in 2010. Ticket sales are way up. Record sales are way down. You have people becoming rock stars on game shows. You have video games with plastic guitars and drums. You have Ashlee Simpson. What does it all mean?

It may seem dire for those of us with a real passion for real music.

But we all have hope—more hope than can be measured. Otherwise we wouldn’t be here today. Sitting next to each other. Making plans for later today, next week, next year. Hey—let’s hang out and listen to that record.

Music is a communal experience.  And of course, us music nerds can sit around a jaw about the EQ of a bass amp, or the lyrical arc of a song, which is all fine and dandy. But real people (non-musicians) need that communal experience, too. You don’t have to know about music to love it, the same way you don’t have to be a cardiologist to know your heart makes you feel good things and bad things. But the cardiologist doesn’t regulate his treatment only to other doctors; he heals real people, the same way musicians have a healing power, and a duty to use it. And any Berklee professor will tell you: if you make music for musicians, you will STARVE.

The young artists who get ahead in today’s industry know about the power of community. You see the amateur MCs free-styling in a group. You see a jazz TRIO trading fours at Wally’s. You see the Monkey Rock Writer’s Circle at All Asia every Wednesday to hang out and play songs for each other.  We’re on the same team.

Some of us will be luckier than others. Some are better connected. Some will just plain work harder.  And the competition is as fierce as it’s ever been. But for the ones with real passion for real music, community will always triumph over competition.

Think of the people you’ve met in Harmony class. The kids you’ve sat next to at Crazy Dough’s. Your humble student newspaper. Of course they’re your friends, but it goes beyond the g-chatting, the Myspace top-friending and the Twitter following. They are your fellow soldiers in this insane industry. They are the ears that will hear your first rough cut. They are the hands that will help you lift that Marshall stack into the back of a Volvo. They are the honest critics who will see you on TV and tell you, ‘You know, the camera really does add about ten lbs.’ They are the ones who will be at your house in sixty years to tell your grandchildren about the time you were in a band together, and you had to lug your drums around on the subway in Manhattan.

Matthews Knowles, music biz heavyweight and father and manager of Beyonce, spoke at David Friend Recital Hall last year. At the end of his conference, he asked all of the singers in the room to stand up. Then the songwriters. Then the drummers. Then the producers. Then the videographers, and so on. Then he said: ‘everyone you need to succeed is right in this room.’

And so it is: everyone, and everything, you need is right here all around you. We’re all on the same team.

Good luck, listen hard, and don’t ever let that mysterious feeling music gives you fade away.

Posted in OpinionsComments (0)

Letter from the Editor

iSight? On the 1 Bus? Why not.

By Zac Taylor
Managing Editor

I’m writing this from the back of the 1 Bus from Harvard Square to Hynes. People are looking at me funny. So what else is new…

The next couple weeks are typically the most fun of the year: turning in all the assignments you’ve missed, cramming for proficiencies (which is typically reserved for this upcoming Sunday), and for us graduates, figuring out what we’re going to do on Monday, May 10.

My time (or reign, if you will) as managing editor of your humble student newspaper is coming to an end; and I like to think I left it better than I found it. For instance—you see how you’re reading this on a screen and not on paper? Still a pretty new thing. And have you notice the new content uploaded everyday? Pretty nifty, right?

I have been interviewing for an entire new staff (with the exception of our Promo Director Christine), and I think you all will be very pleased with the new batch; unlike Saved by The Bell: The New Class. While it has been enriching and inspiring to write about my fellow musicians, it has often been a pickle to swap out my journalist hat for my musician hat and back again. I’m indeed looking forward to having my hands on a guitar and microphone more than a Macbook and mouse.

Speaking of which, I’m releasing my first record, Salesman, next Thursday May 6 at Café 939. My friends Nini + Ben and Kris Roche will be opening up the show, and all of our parents will be in town for graduation. So I guess it’s kind of my senior recital, too (Mainly because I forgot to book 1A in 1140 in time…).

We’ll chat once more before I sign off for good. In the meantime—get those melodic minor runs together, or the terrorists win.

P.S. John Mayer’s not really coming back to Berklee. Gotcha.

Posted in OpinionsComments (0)

Chops vs. Groove

By Colin Ramsay
Contributing Writer

I recently read an article in the April issue of Modern Drummer by managing editor Mike Dawson entitled “Know No Limits,” and a particular line stuck out to me. In reminiscing about excuses he used as a teenager he remembers the thought that “I’ll never be able to play like Vinnie Colaiuta. I’m more a groove drummer.” While Dawson’s purpose was to illustrate the danger of self-imposed limitations, what resonated with me was this idea of chops and technical facility versus groove.

I find that many drummers draw a distinction between chops and groove; You’re either a chops player, or a groove player. The common perception seems to be that they’re two different approaches. Under the “chops” category one might put Weckl, and Vinnie among others. The so-called technicians of drums. On the other hand, groove drummers might include Steve Jordan and the likes. However, I believe such classifications are inherently flawed. The problem is the idea that technical ability and the ability to groove are two separate and distinct entities. I would argue that on the contrary, they’re extremely related and almost inseparable. Of course, this is all personal opinion as is everything in any artistic field, but allow me to wax philosophical for a moment.

Chops are a tool with which to construct a groove, and by groove I don’t mean a beat, but rather a groove. To use a piece of hip drummer lingo, something with a pocket. This is because chops are a quantitative skill while groove is a qualitative skill. The word “chops” brings to mind bpm and numbers, essentially how fast or accurately you’re able to play something, but groove revolves around an unquantifiable feeling. It’s why pocket is one of the most difficult things to teach a drummer. How do you teach someone to make a groove feel good? Some would say pocket is sitting on the back of the beat, but in reality it’s a stylistic choice and playing on top of the beat can feel just as good. This distinction between the nature of chops and groove is the exact reason why the former facilitates the latter. Much like a building that relies on a strong foundation, chops provide the technical foundation upon which to establish a sense of groove.

I think it’s important to mention here that I believe part of the problem is that the labels “chops drummer” and “groove drummer” are somewhat misnomers. We tend to write off technically flashy drummers as the chops guys, while calling more simplistic drummers groovers. Groove, however, is not synonymous with simplicity as chops are not synonymous with a technical playing style. You’d be hard pressed to find someone who is willing to argue that Weckl can’t groove, and while it may not be readily apparent in his playing style, I’d be amazed to find that Steve Jordan doesn’t posses a certain level of chops. The difference is stylistic appropriateness. Fusion calls for more involved, denser drumming so to speak, whereas Jordan’s seat behind John Mayer dictates a straight-ahead, open groove.

Regardless of what a certain style calls for, chops are a drummer’s backbone from which to artistically express themselves. Just as we must learn words before we can verbally express ourselves, we must possess the chops to express ourselves musically – to establish the groove we’re seeking. With that in mind, I encourage all drummers to pursue both chops and groove, and I think you’ll find yourself a more effective drummer, whatever your musical preference.

Posted in OpinionsComments (0)

The 52nd Annual Shammy Awards

By Jehad Choate
Contributing Writer

When musicians think of a Grammy, they think of the highest and oldest honor available in their career. I’m a musician, and I knew nothing of the Grammy Awards growing up because I was more entertained by the MTV Video Music Awards, and was never as interested in a bunch of stuffy professionals in coats and ties, spreading religious propaganda and shooting out 27 names in every thank-you speech. If I wanted that, I would have stayed awake during my high school graduation ceremony. Since MTV stopped playing music and started promoting fist-pumping, and CBS has finally gotten to their earring-wearing, convertible-driving mid-life crisis enough to play contemporary acts in scandalous clothing, I would like to thank the academy, God, my wife, those producers in the corner, and the actual writers of this album for the great honor in recapping the Grammys, because let’s face it, what else is on TV these days that doesn’t make you want to pull your lip over your head and swallow?

The Grammy’s officially state that their awards are the “only peer-presented award to honor artistic achievement, technical proficiency, and overall excellence in the recording industry, without regard to album sales or chart position.” Ironically, these nominees are the same people with the highest grossing album sales and positions in charts. Now I would be fine and dandy with that information, if their credo didn’t include the criterion technical proficiency, and overall excellence. Because of those two not-so-ambiguous terms, I can completely understand why I never watched the Grammy’s before, because it doesn’t honor music of merit as much as it honors the press and egos of artists.

The performances were entertaining, kicking off with Lady Gaga. I am completely fine with admitting I love her. Most coverage completely overshadowed the meaning behind her entire act with the sudden musical cameo appearance of Elton John. I was impressed by her entire show, how she portrayed herself as a monster created by all the people in direct responsibility over her fame. She performed “Poker face” in a revealing, alien-like suit, and then was immediately thrown into some kind of machine, where the MC said she had to leave because she was a monster and she turns everyone who likes her into monsters. the music paused and then the doors of the machine opened to reveal a dirty and disheveled Lady Gaga and Elton John playing on a double-faced piano with arms all over it, where they sang a medley of both his and her music.

For those who retained any sort of metaphorical value in what they saw, it was a scoffing laugh towards the music industry, and far more exciting than the Green Day-meets-Broadway act. All we need now is Avenged Sevenfold singing songs off Rent, and rock, as we know it, can die along with anything else of merit passed down by our predecessors.

Speaking of death—there was yet another tribute to Michael Jackson (as if we didn’t get enough of it from his funeral and movie), followed by a not-so-surprising acceptance of his lifetime achievement award from his kids. I thought I was having an acid flashback when I watched the whole performance because I was not warned about the necessary 3-D glasses. Congratulations Mikey, your kids might not really be of your conception, but the idea of Captain Eo will live on, as your great music is linked with irrelevant 3-D graphics and odd shots of children sleeping in places they shouldn’t (in this case, a forest). Beyonce sang about wanting to be a boy and briefly covered “You Oughta Know” by Alanis Morrisette, because man-hating karaoke and penis envy apparently go hand in hand. Pink performed too, but no body cared until she got naked and soaked, as usual.

With all the visual confetti flying through the air, it’s easy to forget that this show is about…um…what is it about again? Certainly not the merits of good music. I had to sit down and listen to all the ‘Album of the Year’ nominees just so I could know where we stand in pop culture; and much like watching all three Lord of the Rings movies, I can’t get back the time I wasted. The Black-Eyed Peas were up for best album, entitled The E.N.D., a title I find suiting if it refers to the use of natural vocals in a production. I thought musicians were supposed to progress with time, but it seems the Peas get worse with every album they’ve put out since Elephunk. Their lyrics are meaningless, their beats are conventionally cookie-cutter, and now with their sudden fascination with the Auto-tune plug-in, they are just pulling off a glorified version of what any amateur musician can do with a few hundred bucks. Dave Matthews Band was also up for best album, but that was just a sympathy screw from the academy, since everyone knows the worst part about Dave Matthews Band is, well, Dave.

That left Beyonce, Lady Gaga, and Taylor Swift. Now, after sitting down and listening to these three artists, I could see why Beyonce’s I am…Sasha Fierce album was considered: the hooks are great, the beats are solid, the words have shape to them, and her voice, although pretentious most of the time, is still powerful. Lady Gaga’s Fame had a similar vibe, and I kind of wanted her to win because her music is more infectious, even if you’re not a fan. But the winner of ‘Album of the Year’ went to Taylor Swift’s Fearless. I particularly enjoyed Taylor’s reaction to all her winnings; I would be shocked too if I won all those awards and knew my music sucked so bad. The entire Fearless album sounds like a banal Avril Lavigne singing on top of leftover Faith Hill tracks. Every song has a droning power ballad vibe devoid of any real dynamic contrast, perfect for your everyday Nashville reject soundtrack behind a chick flick starring Ashton Kutcher. Fearless. Her music is only fearless because it’s naïve and inexperienced.

I learned something while heavily critiquing the Grammys though. I learned that I do have the professional ability to put my particular tastes aside and evaluate contemporary music for what it is, even if it’s mostly crap. I also learned that I am still a musician, and if ever the opportunity came up where I could obtain a Grammy, I’ll take it, not because it’s an honor, but because I could probably pawn it to pay off my insane amount of music school loans. I’m going to go watch the newest episode of Jersey Shore. Congratulations Grammys, you’ve officially encouraged me to change my passion to accounting.

Posted in OpinionsComments (0)

Letter from the Editor

Harvard Bridge SmootsThe other day, I got to the Central Square bus stop just in time to the CT-1 pull away.  It was sunny and warm for a November day in Boston, so I decided to walk to school. I passed by the Middle East and got a noseful of fresh hummus and pita bread. Then came the rack of dainty dress shirt and clay pots for sale at the Salvation Army. And of course, All Asia’s corner window full of posters of local bands, most of whom I know personally. As I neared MIT, another bus passed that I would have caught had I waited back at Central; but I knew where I was heading, and I got there just the same.

Maybe the Do-It-Yourself approach to being a musician is similar to strategizing how to get around Boston on the T. Maybe you don’t need a record label or major distributor if you find a way to do it all yourself. You’d save money, and you would get to relish the details of the journey—that is—if you have an idea of where you’re heading. And you get to experience whatever the music industry equivalent is of the walk across the Harvard Bridge over the Charles River, and see the rugby shirt-clad sailors fight the wind in their catamarans.

We’re at a time when the industry has such ebb and flow to it that you don’t know if catching a bus to where you’re going is a good idea. Maybe stepping on it means you’re a sell-out, and you’ve just surrendered all your control to the bus driver, who answers to the MBTA. But maybe trying to walk somewhere with your own two feet lugging your own bags will leave your body tired, and your spirit fatigued. There’s no way of knowing. But I guess if you have an idea of where you’re going—either way will suffice.

If you have any shows coming up or a new record you want to promote, please let us know. Then we can publish something like, for example, Zac Taylor and Johnny Nicholson are opening up for Nini & Ben’s CD Release show this Saturday at the Lily Pad. You see? It’s easy!

Have a great week.

Zac Taylor
Managing Editor

NINIandBEN

Posted in OpinionsComments (0)

Re-Up, Sex!, and DJ Tava Luv Host & Promote Halloween Bash

By Owen Ross
Contributing Writer

Let me start out by saying that we have put together an awesome event for this Friday, October 30. Read the full story

Posted in ProfilesComments (0)

advert
  • Upcoming Events

  • Switch to our mobile site